Yes, Good Endoscopic Powder Do Exist
Yes, Good Endoscopic Powder Do Exist
Blog Article
Endoscopic Powder: A Game-Changer in Haemostasis for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Effective control of haemostasis is critical to the success of any surgical procedure. Beyond minimizing intraoperative blood loss, it significantly reduces the risks associated with transfusions and postoperative complications. In minimally invasive surgeries like laparoscopy or endoscopy, controlling bleeding is especially challenging due to limited space, visibility, and anatomical intricacy.
As more procedures move toward minimally invasive methods, there’s a greater demand for flexible, effective bleeding control solutions when traditional methods aren’t enough.
Why Bleeding Control in MIS is Difficult
While MIS offers benefits such as shorter recovery and less scarring compared to open surgery, it brings new challenges. However, these benefits come with the challenge of difficult bleeding management. Reduced access, poor visualisation, and no sense of touch make handling bleeding in MIS more difficult.
Suturing, tying, or cauterising are not always feasible in minimally invasive procedures. Here, topical haemostats such as endoscopic powders become essential, helping to control bleeding and improve surgical efficiency.
Surgi-ORC® Powder: An Innovative Haemostatic Solution
Surgi-ORC® endoscopic powder is a standout, plant-derived, absorbable haemostat with robust clinical backing. Originally launched as a sheet in 1943, ORC has now been adapted into powder to address the needs of current minimally invasive surgeries.
Advantages of Surgi-ORC® Endoscopic Powder
• Accelerated Clotting: ORC’s mechanism enhances platelet activity and clot formation
• Conformability: The powder’s granular shape adapts to wounds, covering both large and deep surfaces
• Plant-Based Safety: Free from animal or human components, it reduces risks of immune reactions and disease transmission
• Antibacterial Environment: The oxidation process lowers pH, creating an acidic microenvironment that offers bactericidal benefits
• Fully Absorbable: Powder dissolves safely, posing no harm to nerves or vessels
Thanks to these features, Surgi-ORC® powder excels at controlling bleeding from small vessels in restricted surgical fields.
Optimizing Application with Delivery Devices in MIS
The delivery method is a critical yet often overlooked factor in a powder’s haemostatic performance. Bellows pump applicators are commonly used for precise powder placement in minimally invasive settings.
How It Works
Syringe-style bellows devices, fitted with short or long tips, can deliver powder through MIS access points. By manually compressing the bellows, surgeons can apply a consistent amount of haemostatic agent directly onto the bleeding site without obstructing the surgical view.
Key Considerations for Optimal Use
• Orientation: The angle of device orientation (vertical vs. horizontal) has a significant impact on the amount and spread of the powder. Surprisingly, orientation often affects performance more than the speed or force of compression
• Physical Properties of Powder: Particle size, flow characteristics, and moisture sensitivity also influence output
• Application Style: The surgeon’s technique and compression force also influence powder delivery
Real-World Applications of Endoscopic Powder
When working in tight spaces or near fragile tissues, endoscopic powder is especially useful. Its flexible form lets it cover both wide wounds and tight spaces with equal efficiency.
Typical Applications:
• Minimally invasive liver surgeries
• Thoracic surgery procedures
• Gynaecology MIS surgeries
• Submucosal dissection cases
• Minimally invasive urology surgeries
Endoscopic powders boost surgical efficiency by speeding up haemostasis, cutting transfusion needs, and improving results.
Clinical Data Supporting ORC Powder
Research on SURGICEL® Powder in 103 surgical patients found:
• 87.4% haemostasis at 5 minutes, rising to 92.2% at 10 minutes
• Excellent results across open and minimally invasive surgeries
• No product-related complications—no rebleeding, thromboembolism, or adverse reactions
• Surgeons rated it highly effective and easy to use, with precise powder delivery and minimal need for additional intervention [3]
Overall, the data shows SURGICEL® Powder as a safe, effective, and adaptable haemostatic agent—especially when conventional tools aren’t enough.
Conclusion
The future of MIS depends on effective, next-generation haemostatic agents. Among these, ORC endoscopic powder has proven to be both efficient and easy for surgeons to use.
No matter the complexity—be it confined spaces, delicate organs, or irregular wounds—ORC endoscopic powder ensures safe, effective bleeding control for today’s surgical demands.
References
1. Zhang Y, Song D, Huang H, Liang Z, Liu H, Huang Y, Zhong C, Ye G. Minimally invasive hemostatic materials: tackling a dilemma of fluidity and adhesion by photopolymerization in situ. Scientific Reports. 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15250.
2. De la Torre RA, Bachman SL, Wheeler AA, Bartow KN, Scott JS. Hemostasis and hemostatic agents in minimally invasive surgery. Surgery. 2007 Oct 1;142(4):S39-45.
3. Al-Attar N, de Jonge E, Kocharian R, Ilie B, Barnett E, Berrevoet F. Endoscopic Powder Safety and hemostatic effectiveness of SURGICEL® powder in mild and moderate intraoperative bleeding. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. 2023 Jul;29:10760296231190376.
4. Xiao X, Wu Z. A narrative review of different hemostatic materials in emergency treatment of trauma. Emerg Med Int. 2022;2022: 6023261
5. Stark M, Wang AY, Corrigan B, Woldu HG, Azizighannad S, Cipolla G, Kocharian R, De Leon H. Comparative analyses of the hemostatic efficacy and surgical device performance of powdered oxidized regenerated cellulose and starch-based powder formulations. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2025 Jan 1;9(1):102668.
6. Bustamante-Balén M, Plumé G. Role of hemostatic powders in the endoscopic management of gastrointestinal bleeding. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology. 2014 Aug 15;5(3):284. Report this page